“We’re less noticeable to people”
Centering Tween Girl Activist Citizenship
Keywords:
activism, case study, citizenship, innocence, social construction, tween girlhoodAbstract
In recent years, there has been significant attention paid to girls who are engaged in activism. When we look at who has been recognized for their activism, however, mainstream exposure to girl activists has primarily included teenagers and youth. Girls of the tweenhood age, for example, are also engaged in activism but their efforts go largely unnoticed or face patronization. Instead of being taken seriously, the activism of many tween girls is: (1) clouded by the constructed inherent innocence of childhood, (2) entangled with the construction of (white) tween girlhood as a time of frivolity and fun, and (3) marginalized due to the adult-centric nature of citizenship in Canada and the United States. As the very structures that would traditionally allow for adults to make their voices heard are not designed for the equitable participation of children, tween girls are required to participate in creative ways. This article, therefore, frames tween girls’ activism as citizenship and offers opportunities to both reconsider and validate these varied activist practices as legitimate democratic participation. Tween girls are already shaping their social, cultural, and political worlds, asserting that they belong and deserve to be seen, heard, and taken seriously. The lenses of societal and feminist responses need to be reoriented and refocused to see it.
Metrics
References
Bernstein, Robin. 2011. Racial Innocence: Performing American Childhood from Slavery to Civil Rights. New York: New York University Press.
Blackburn, Carole. 2009. “Differentiating Indigenous Citizenship: Seeking Multiplicity in Rights, Identity, and Sovereignty in Canada.” American Ethnologist 36 (1): 66-68. doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.01103.x
Cohen, Elizabeth F. 2005. “Neither Seen Nor Heard: Children’s Citizenship in Contemporary Democracies.” Citizenship Studies 9 (2): 221-240. doi.org/10.1080/13621020500069687
Cook, Daniel Thomas, and Susan B. Kaiser. 2004. “Betwixt and be Tween: Age Ambiguity and the Sexualization of the Female Consuming Subject.” Journal of Consumer Culture 4 (2): 203-227. doi.org/10.1177/1469540504043682
Coulter, Natalie. 2014. Tweening the Girl: The Crystallization of the Tween Market. New York: Peter Lang AG.
Coulter, Natalie. 2021. “‘Frappes, friends, and fun’: Affective Labor and the Cultural Industry of Girlhood.” Journal of Consumer Culture 21 (3): 487-500. doi.org/10.1177/1469540518806954
Elections Canada. 2018. “Mapping the Legal Consciousness of First Nations Voters: Understanding Voting Rights Mobilization.” August 27. www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=res&dir=rec/part/APRC/vot_rights&document=p4&lang=e
Garlen, Julie C. 2019. “Interrogating Innocence: ‘Childhood’ as Exclusionary Social Practice.” Childhood 26 (1):54–67. doi.org/10.1177/0907568218811484
Harris, Anita. 2006. “Citizenship and the Self-Made Girl.” In The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Gender & Education, edited by Madeleine Arnot and Martin Mac An Ghaill, 267-281. New York: Routledge.
Honderich, M. 2021. Why Canada is Mourning the Deaths of Hundreds of Children. July 1. BBC News. www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57325653
Isin, Engin F. 2008. “Theorizing Acts of Citizenship.” In Acts of Citizenship, edited by Engin F. Isin and Greg M. Nielson, 15-43. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Isin, Engin F. 2009. “Citizenship in Flux: The Figure of the Activist Citizen.” Subjectivity 29: 367-388. doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.25
Larkins, Cath. 2014. “Enacting Children’s Citizenship: Developing Understandings of How Children Enact Themselves as Citizens Through Actions and Acts of Citizenship.” Childhood 21 (1): 7-21. doi.org/10.1177/0907568213481815
Lister, Ruth. 2007. “Why Citizenship: Where, When and How Children?” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8 (2):693-718. doi.org/10.1177/0907568213481815
Meyer, Anneke. 2007. “The Moral Rhetoric of Childhood.” Childhood 14 (1): 85-104. doi.org/10.1177/0907568207072532
Mitchell, Claudia and Jacqueline Reid-Walsh. 2005. “Theorizing Tween Culture Within Girlhood Studies.” In Seven Going on Seventeen: Tween Studies in the Culture of Girlhood edited by Claudia Mitchell and Jacequline Reid-Walsh, 1-21. New York: Peter Lang AG.
Moosa-Mitha, Mehmoona. 2005. “A Difference-Centered Alternative to Theorization of Children’s Citizenship Rights.” Citizenship Studies 9 (4): 369-388. doi.org/10.1080/13621020500211354
Percy-Smith, Barry. 2015. “Negotiating Active Citizenship: Young People’s Participation in Everyday Spaces. In Politics, Citizenship and Rights: Geographies of Children and Young People by Kirsi Pauliina Kallio, Sarah Mills, and Tracey Skelton. London, UK: Springer. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/23226/
Pimentel, Tamara. 2021. “Non-Indigenous Students in Calgary Pushing to Remove Langevin Name From School.” APTN News, April 4.
Robinson, Kerry H. 2008. “In the Name of ‘Childhood Innocence:’ A Discursive Exploration of the Moral Panic Associated with Childhood and Sexuality.” Cultural Studies Review 14 (2): 113-129. doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.601354235410178
Robinson, Kerry H. 2012. Innocence, Knowledge, and the Construction ofChildhood: The Contradictory Nature of Sexuality and Censorship in Children’s Contemporary Lives. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Roche, Jeremy. 1999. “Children: Rights, Participation and Citizenship.” Childhood 6 (4): 475-493. doi.org/10.1177/0907568299006004006
Smith, Karen. 2011. “Producing Governable Subjects: Images of Childhood Old and New.” Childhood 19 (1): 24-37. doi.org/10.1177/0907568211401434
Taefi, Nura. 2009. “The Synthesis of Age and gender: Intersectionality, International Human Rights Law and the Marginalization of the Girl Child.” International Journal of Children’s Rights 17: 345-376. doi.org/10.1163/157181809X458049
Taft, Jessica K. 2011. Rebel Girls: Youth Activism and Social Change Across the Americas. New York: New York University Press.
Taft, Jessica K. 2014. “The Political Lives of Girls.” Sociology Compass 8 (3): 259-267. doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12135
Taft, Jessica K. 2020. “Hopeful, Harmless, and Heroic: Figuring the Girl Activist as Global Savior.” Girlhood Studies 13 (2): 1-17. doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2020.130203
Tisdall, E. Kay M., and Patricio Cuevas-Parra. 2022. “Beyond the Familiar Challenges for Children and Young People’s Participation Rights: The Potential of Activism.” The International Journal of Human Rights 26 (5): 792–810. doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1968377
UNESCO. 2021. Youth. https://www.unesco.org/en/youth
UNICEF. Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989. https://www.unicef.org/media/52626/file
Wall, John. 2022. “From Childhood Studies to Childism: Reconstructing the Scholarly and Social Imaginations.” Children’s Geographies 20 (3): 257-270. doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1668912
Walton, Ellie. 2021. “The Queer Child Cracks: Queer Feminist Encounters with Materiality and Innocence in Childhood Studies.” Childhood 28 (3): 333-345. doi.org/10.1177/09075682211026948.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alexe Bernier
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are aware that articles published in Atlantis are indexed and made available through various scholarly and professional search tools, including but not limited to Erudit.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to preprint their work, that is, post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Read more on preprints here.
