Women Challenging the Constitution: New Evidence

Auteurs-es

  • Naomi Black York University Mount Saint Vincent University
  • Louise Carbert Dalhousie University

Mots-clés :

Canadian women's movement, Canadian constitutional history, Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Résumé

Abstract

This article is more political than legal. Using the ap­proaches identified by feminist institutionalism, it fo­cuses on the interactions between the Canadian Advi­sory Council on the Status of Women (CACSW) and the Canadian government during the constitutional cri­sis of 1980-1981. How did the gendered institutions of the federal government facilitate a narrative that, finally, was harmful to the women’s movement in Canada?

 

Résumé

Cet article est plus politique que juridique. En utilisant les approches identifiées par les institutions féministes, il se penche sur les interactions entre le Conseil consul­tatif canadien sur la situation de la femme (CCCSF) et le gouvernement du Canada durant la crise constitution­nelle de 1980-1981. Comment les institutions marquées par la différenciation des sexes du gouvernement fédé­ral ont-elles facilité un récit qui était, en fin de compte, nuisible au mouvement féministe au Canada?

Statistiques

Chargement des statistiques…

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Naomi Black, York University Mount Saint Vincent University

Professor Emerita, York University

Political Science and Women's Studies

 

Adjunct Professor, Mount Saint Vincent University

Women's Studies

Louise Carbert, Dalhousie University

Associate Professor

Political Science, Gender & Women's Studies, Canadian Studies

Références

Anderson, Doris. 1991. The Unfinished Revolution: The Status of Women in Twelve Countries. Toronto, ON: Doubleday Canada.

_______. 1996. Rebel Daughter. Toronto, ON: Key Porter Books.

Aschaiek, Sharon. 2014. “Feminist in the Footlights.” U of T Mississauga Magazine (Spring): 8.

Bennett, Carolyn. 2007. “Which Way to Ottawa?” Canadian Woman Studies 26 (2): 42-54.

Bird, Florence. 1981. “Notes for the meeting to take place February 16/81.” Typescript.

Burt, Sandra. 1998. “The Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women: Possibilities and Limitations.” In Women and Political Representation in Canada, edited by Manon Tremblay and Caroline Andrew, 115-144. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.

Canada. Parliament. 1981. Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and of the House of Commons on the Constitution of Canada. 32nd Parliament, 1st session, issue no. 36. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada.

Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women (CACSW). 1978. Sharing the Power. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.

_______. 1979. 10 Years Later: An Assessment of the Federal Government’s Implementation of the Recommendations made by the Royal Commission on the Status of Women. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.

_______. 1980. Women, Human Rights, and the Constitution. Revised Edition. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.

_______. 1981. Annual Report 1980-81. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.

Champagne, Lyse. 1980. Not How Many But How Few: Women Appointed to Boards, Commissions, Councils, Committees and Crown Corporations within the Power of the Federal Government. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.

Collins, Anne. 1981. “Which Way to Ottawa: A Special Report on the Women’s Conference on the Constitution.” City Woman (Holiday): 11-32.

Cooke, Katie. 2001. A Civil Tongue. Victoria, BC: Bridges for Women Society.

Cuthbert Brandt, Gail, Naomi Black, Paula Bourne, and Magda Fahrni. 2011. Canadian Women: A History. 3rd edition. Toronto, ON: Nelson.

Dobrowolsky, Alexandra. 2000. The Politics of Pragmatism: Women, Representation, and Constitutionalism in Canada. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.

Eberts, Mary A. 1980. Women & Constitutional Renewal. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.

Findlay, Sue. 1988. “Feminist Struggles with the Canadian State: 1966-1988.” Resources for Feminist Research 17 (3): 5-9.

Findlay, Suzanne. 1987. “Facing the State: The Politics of the Women’s Movement Reconsidered.” In Feminism and Political Economy: Women’s Work, Women’s Struggles, edited by Heather Jon Maroney and Meg Luxton, 31-50. Toronto, ON: Methuen Publications.

Freeman, Barbara. 2001. The Satellite Sex: The Media and Women’s Issues in English Canada, 1966-1971. Kitchener-Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

Froc, Kerri. 2014. “Is Originalism Bad for Women? The Curious Case of Canada’s ‘Equal Rights Amendment.’” Review of Constitutional Studies 19 (2): 237-279.

Frum, Barbara. 1971. “Why There Are so Few Women in Ottawa.” Chatelaine 44: 33, 110.

Gray, Elizabeth. 1981. “The Exit of an Iron Will.” Maclean’s, February 2: 28-29.

Greschner, Donna. 2005. “Praise and Promises.” Supreme Court Law Review 29: 63-83.

Kenny, Meryl. 2014. “A Feminist Institutionalist Approach.” Gender & Politics 10 (4): 679-684.

Kome, Penney. 1983. The Taking of Twenty-Eight: Women Challenge the Constitution. Toronto, ON: Women’s Press.

_______. 2007. “Face-Off. Doris Anderson at the Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women.” Canadian Woman Studies 26 (2): 61-69.

Korinek, Valerie. 2000. Roughing It in the Suburbs: Reading Chatelaine Magazine in the Fifties and Sixties. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

Landsberg, Michele. 2011. Writing the Revolution. Toronto, ON: Second Story Press.

Linzey, Joanne. 1981. “ACSW members tells the other side of the Doris Anderson story.” Kinesis, April: 17-18. Originally published in the Yukon’s OptiMSt.

Lowndes, Vivien. 2014. “How are Things Done Around Here: Uncovering Institutional Rules and Their Gendered Effects.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): 685-690.

Mackay, Fiona. 2014. “Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): 549-571.

Macpherson, Kay. 1994. When in Doubt, Do Both: The Times of My Life. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

Malloy, Jonathan. 2003. Between Colliding Worlds: The Ambiguous Existence of Government Agencies for Aboriginal and Women’s Policy. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

Manfredi, Christopher. 2004. Legal Mobilization and the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.

Martin, Sandra. 2007. “Women’s Rights Champion Doris Anderson Dies at 85.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), March 3.

McPhedran, Marilou. 2007. “The Fight for the Charter.” Canadian Woman Studies 26 (2): 80-83.

O’Neil, Huguette. 2004. Yvette Rousseau: la réussite d’une vie. Montréal, QC: Remue-ménage.

O’Neil, Maureen, and Sharon Sutherland. 1997. “The Machinery of Women’s Policy: Implementing the RCSW.” In Women and the Canadian State, edited by Caroline Andrew and Sandra Rodgers, 197-219. Montréal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Pal, Leslie. 1995. Interests of State: The Politics of Language, Multiculturalism, and Feminism in Canada. Montréal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Peckford, Brian. 2012. Someday the Sun Will Shine and Have Not Will Be No More. Saint John’s, NL: Flanker Press.

Rebick, Judy. 2005. Ten Thousand Roses: The Making of a Feminist Revolution. Toronto, ON: Penguin.

Reid, Julyan, with Linda Markowsky. 2007. “A National Presence.” Canadian Woman Studies 26 (2): 56-60.

Riley, Susan. 1981. “The Party or the Principle.” Maclean’s, January 12: 18-19.

Royal Commission on the Status of Women in Canada (RCSW). 1970. Report. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada.

Sisler, Berenice. 1997. The Perpetuation of a Myth: The Anderson-Axworthy Affair. Typescript. Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba Archives.

Stein, Michael. 1989. Canadian Constitutional Renewal, 1968-81: A Case Study in Integrative Bargaining. Research Paper 27. Kingston, ON: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University.

Vickers, Jill, Pauline Rankin, and Christine Appelle. 1993. Politics as if Women Mattered: A Political Analysis of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

Young. Lisa. 2000. Feminists and Party Politics. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2016-07-13

Numéro

Vol. 37 No. 2 (2015): Critical Perspectives on Canadian Anti-Trafficking Discourse and Policy and Canadian Women Challenge the Constitution

Rubrique

37.2 (1) - Canadian Women Challenge the Constitution: The Story Behind the Story

Licence

Les auteurs qui publient dans cette revue acceptent les conditions suivantes:

1. Les auteurs conservent les droits d’auteur et accordent le droit de première publication à la revue. L’œuvre est simultanément sous licence internationale Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 qui permet à d’autres personnes de la partager en citant dans les remerciements l’auteur de l’œuvre et sa publication initiale dans cette revue.

2. Les auteurs savent que les articles publiés dans Atlantis sont indexés et disponibles par le biais de divers outils de recherche universitaires et professionnels, y compris, entre autres, Erudit.

3. Les auteurs peuvent conclure des ententes contractuelles supplémentaires et distinctes pour la distribution non exclusive de la version de l’article publiée par la revue (c’est-à-dire, l’afficher dans un dépôt institutionnel ou la publier dans un livre), en signalant qu’elle a été initialement publiée dans cette revue.

4. Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à prépublier leur œuvre, c’est-à-dire à la publier en ligne (dans un dépôt institutionnel ou sur leur site Web, par exemple) avant et pendant le processus de soumission. Cela peut conduire à des échanges productifs, ainsi qu’à ce que le travail publié soit cité plus tôt et plus souvent. Renseignez-vous davantage ici sur la prépublication.