The Paradox of Inter/Disciplinarity: A Rethinking of the Politics of Inter/Disciplinarity and ‘Women’s and Gender Studies’ for the Current Moment

Auteurs-es

  • Karen Ella McCallum School of Advanced Study, University of London
  • Felicia Rahaman McMaster University
  • Haley Turnbull M.A. Gender Studies and Feminist Research, McMaster University; B.A. History and Political Science, University of Toronto

Mots-clés :

Pedagogy, Interdisciplinarity, WGS Graduate Program

Résumé

Abstract
In this paper, we argue that Women’s and Gender Studies (WGS) should be embraced and acknowledged as a discipline. This is premised on two contentions: that disciplines are arbitrarily differentiated and that couching WGS in the mystique of interdisciplinarity serves to marginalize the study of issues pertinent to gender, women, and feminisms in comparison to other topics. We maintain that WGS is disciplinary, but we also highlight the importance of multi- and interdisciplinary partnerships and research.

Résumé
Dans cet article, nous faisons valoir que les études des femmes et du genre doivent être acceptées et reconnues comme une discipline. Cet argument est basé sur deux assertions : que les disciplines font l’objet d’une distinction arbitraire et que la présentation des études des femmes et du genre dans la mystique de l’interdisciplinarité ne fait que marginaliser l’étude des enjeux pertinents au genre, aux femmes et au féminisme, comparativement à d’autres disciplines. Nous soutenons que les études des femmes et du genre sont disciplinaires, mais nous mettons aussi en évidence l’importance des partenariats et des recherches multidisciplinaires et interdisciplinaires.

Statistiques

Chargement des statistiques…

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Karen Ella McCallum, School of Advanced Study, University of London

Karen McCallum is a second-generation Canadian settler and scholar interested in issues of Indigenous governance and sovereignty, critical settler studies, gender and feminism, and female embodiment and work. She is an MPhil/ PhD candidate at the University of London, School of Advanced Study in the Human Rights Consortium, studying Human Rights with a focus on decolonial potentialities for settler and Indigenous peoples in Canada.

Felicia Rahaman, McMaster University

Felicia Rahaman is a scholar whose research interests include the construction of gender roles and stereotypes through language in television and film, feminist legal theory, and issues concerning sex and gender in organizational settings with a focus on occupational sex segregation, and gender pay equity. She is currently working at the YWCA, Durham.

 

Haley Turnbull, M.A. Gender Studies and Feminist Research, McMaster University; B.A. History and Political Science, University of Toronto

Haley Turnbull is a Feminist scholar and activist living in Vancouver, BC. Her research focuses primarily on the lack of feminist, anti-oppressive quantitative teaching and content in Canadian Gender Studies programs. She sits on the executive of the Women’s and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes (WGSRF), and runs The Scarlet Woman, a feminist blog.

Références

Allen, Judith A. and Sally L. Kitch. 1998. “Disciplined by Disciplines? The Need for an Interdisciplinary Research Mission in Women’s Studies.” Feminist Studies 24 (2): 275-299.

Bertrand, Frédéric, Éric Archambault, Julie Caruso, Olivier Demers-Payette, and Étienne Vignola-Gagné. 2006. A Profile of Master’s Degree Education in Canada. Study completed by Science-Metrix Inc. for Canadian Association of Graduate Studies.

Bostic, M.L. 1998. “Unsuitable Job for a Woman? Women at Work, Status and Issues.” Journal of Industrial Technology 15 (1): 2-6.

Boxer, Marilyn. 1998. “Remapping the University: The Promise of the Women’s Studies Ph.D.” Feminist Studies 24 (2): 387-402.

Braithwaite, Ann. 2012. “Discipline.” In Rethinking Women’s and Gender Studies, edited by Catherine M. Orr, Ann Braithwaite, and Diane Lichtenstein, 209-224. New York: Routledge.

Braithwaite, Ann, Susan Heald, Susanne Luhmann, and Sharon Rosenberg. 2005. “Introduction: ‘Passing On’ Women’s Studies.” In Troubling Women’s Studies: Pasts, Presents, and Possibilities, 9-42. Toronto: Sumach Press.

Brown, Wendy. 2008. “The Impossibility of Women’s Studies.” In Women’s Studies on the Edge, edited by Joan Wallach Scott, 17-38. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.

Coyner, Sandra. 1983. “Women’s Studies as an Academic Discipline: Why and How to Do It.” In Theories of Women’s Studies, edited by Gloria Bowles, Renate Duelli-Klein, and Renate Klein, 46-71. Boston: Routledge.

Demény, Enikö, Clare Hemmings, Ulla Holm, Päivi Korvajärvi, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, and Veronica Vasterling. 2006. Practicing Interdisciplinarity in Gender Studies. York, UK: Raw Nerve Books.

Department of History. “Graduate.” University of Toronto. Accessed September 19, 2013. http://www.history.utoronto.ca/graduate/index.html.

Department of Political Science. “About the Department.” University of Toronto. Accessed

September 19, 2013. http://politics.utoronto.ca/about/.

DeVault, Marjorie L. 1999. Liberating Method: Feminism and Social Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Friedman, Susan Stanford. 1998. “(Inter)Disciplinarity and the Question of the Women’s Studies Ph.D.” Feminist Studies 24 (2): 301-325.

Grace, Nancy McCampbell. 1996. “An Exploration of the Interdisciplinary Character of Women’s Studies.” Issues in Integrative Studies 14: 59-86.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “‘Situated Knowledges’: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 6 (2): 13-24.

Hark, Sabine. 2005. “Blurring Boundaries, Crossing Borders, Traversing Frontiers: Inter- and Transdisciplinarity Revisited.” Paper presented at Disciplinary Barriers between the Social Sciences and the Humanities, Turku/Abo, Finland, June 9-11.

Hayes, Eileen M. 2010. Songs in Black and Lavender: Race, Sexual Politics, and Women's Music. Chicago: The University of Illinois Press.

Hemmings, Clare. 2011. Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Interdisciplinary Degree Programs. “Multidisciplinary Studies.” University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Accessed September 19, 2015. http://www.unlv.edu/interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary-studies.

Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience. “The Neuroscience Program at the University of Iowa.” University of Iowa Graduate College. Accessed September 19, 2015. http://neuroscience.grad.uiowa.edu/.

Laursen, S., H. Thiry, and H. Loshbaugh. 2009. “What Have We Learned? Across the U.S., Ph.D. Programs in Chemistry Are Changing to Meet Contemporary Demands: First Findings from a Study of Professional Preparation of Chemistry Ph.D.s.” University of Colorado at Boulder. Accessed September 25, 2013. http://www.colorado.edu/eer/downloads/ChemPhDtrendsResearchBrief2009.pdf

Lichtenstein, Diane. 2012. “Interdisciplinarity.” In Rethinking Women’s and Gender Studies, edited by Catherine M. Orr, Ann Braithwaite, and Diane Lichtenstein, 34-64. New York: Routledge Press.

Maynard, Mary, and Jane Purvis. 1998. New Frontiers in Women’s Studies: Knowledge, Identity and Nationalism. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.

McCaughey, Martha. 2012. “Community.” In Rethinking Women’s and Gender Studies, edited by Catherine M. Orr, Ann Braithwaite, and Diane Lichtenstein, 135-151. New York: Routledge Press.

Newell, William H., and William J. Green. 1982. “Defining and Teaching Interdisciplinary Studies.” Improving College and University Teaching 30 (1): 23-30. [Reprinted in William Henry Newell, ed. 1998. Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature. New York: The College Board.]

Noble, Bobby. 2012. “Trans.” In Rethinking Women’s and Gender Studies, edited by Catherine M. Orr, Ann Braithwaite, and Diane Lichtenstein, 277-292. New York: Routledge Press.

Orr, Catherine. 2012. “Activism.” In Rethinking Women’s and Gender Studies, edited by Catherine M. Orr, Ann Braithwaite, and Diane Lichtenstein, 85-101. New York: Routledge Press.

Pray, Leslie. 2002. “Interdisciplinarity in Science and Engineering: Academia in Transition.” Science Career Magazine. January 17. http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2002_01_17/no

Pryse, Marjorie. 2000. “Trans/Feminist Methodology: Bridges to Interdisciplinary Thinking.” National Women’s Studies Association Journal 12 (2): 105-118.

Salamon, Gayle. 2008. “Transfeminism and the Future of Gender.” In Women’s Studies on the Edge, edited by Joan Wallach Scott, 115-136. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

School of Education and Social Policy. “Multidisciplinary Program in Education Sciences.” Northwestern University. Accessed September 19, 2013. https://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/mpes/.

Thompson Klein, Julie. 1993. “Blurring, Cracking, and Crossing: Permeation and the Fracturing of Discipline.” In Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies of Disciplinarity, edited by Ellen Messer-Davidow, David R. Shumway, and David J. Sylvan, 185-211. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

Women and Gender Studies Institute. “Graduate Collaborative Program in Women and Gender Studies.” University of Toronto. Accessed September 19, 2013a.

http://www.wgsi.utoronto.ca/graduate/collaborative-program.

_______. “Masters Program in Women and Gender Studies.” University of Toronto. Accessed September 19, 2013b. http://www.wgsi.utoronto.ca/graduate/ma-program.

Yee, Shirley. 1993. “Establishing an International Doctoral Program in Women’s Studies at the University of Washington.” Feminist Studies 24 (2): 336-373.

Téléchargements

Fichiers supplémentaires

Publié-e

2015-09-30

Numéro

Vol. 37 No. 1 (2015): Intimacies/Affect and Transgressing Borders/Boundaries: Gendering Space and Place

Rubrique

37.1- Open

Licence

Les auteurs qui publient dans cette revue acceptent les conditions suivantes:

1. Les auteurs conservent les droits d’auteur et accordent le droit de première publication à la revue. L’œuvre est simultanément sous licence internationale Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 qui permet à d’autres personnes de la partager en citant dans les remerciements l’auteur de l’œuvre et sa publication initiale dans cette revue.

2. Les auteurs savent que les articles publiés dans Atlantis sont indexés et disponibles par le biais de divers outils de recherche universitaires et professionnels, y compris, entre autres, Erudit.

3. Les auteurs peuvent conclure des ententes contractuelles supplémentaires et distinctes pour la distribution non exclusive de la version de l’article publiée par la revue (c’est-à-dire, l’afficher dans un dépôt institutionnel ou la publier dans un livre), en signalant qu’elle a été initialement publiée dans cette revue.

4. Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à prépublier leur œuvre, c’est-à-dire à la publier en ligne (dans un dépôt institutionnel ou sur leur site Web, par exemple) avant et pendant le processus de soumission. Cela peut conduire à des échanges productifs, ainsi qu’à ce que le travail publié soit cité plus tôt et plus souvent. Renseignez-vous davantage ici sur la prépublication.