The Politics of Abortion in New Brunswick
Mots-clés :
abortion, rights, morality, citizenship, New Brunswick, political climate, social climateRésumé
Abstract
This paper examines one of the most notorious, yet largely overlooked, provinces in terms of abortion access in Canada: New Brunswick. Through an exploration of the provincial government’s activities and litigation in the province, this article traces the history of abortion regulation in New Brunswick, with particular attention paid to the manner in which social movement activism has shaped policy. It argues for the need to reframe abortion as a matter of equal citizenship. Specifically, it suggests that such a rethinking could generate political pressure for recognition and improved services, and stimulate a public discourse that has the potential to begin breaking down the more complex, extra-legal barriers faced by women in Canada.
Résumé
Cet article examine l’une des provinces les plus notoires, mais pourtant grandement négligée, en termes d’accès à l’avortement au Canada, c’est-à-dire le Nouveau-Brunswick. À travers un examen des activités du gouvernement provincial et des litiges dans la province, cet article explore l’histoire de la réglementation de l’avortement au Nouveau-Brunswick, en portant une attention particulière à la façon dont l’activisme du mouvement social a contribué à façonner les politiques. Il fait valoir la nécessité de resituer le contexte de l’avortement comme une question d’égalité des citoyens. Plus spécifiquement, il suggère qu’une nouvelle façon de penser pourrait créer des pressions politiques pour la reconnaissance et l’amélioration des services et stimuler une discussion publique qui pourrait peut-être commencer à éliminer les obstacles plus complexes et extrajudiciaires auxquels les femmes font face au Canada.
Statistiques
Références
Abortions Rights Coalition of Canada (ARCC). 2007. Clinic Funding - Overview of Political Situation. Vancouver: Abortions Rights Coalition of Canada.
Abortions Rights Coalition of Canada (ARCC). 2010. Anti-Choice Private Members Bills and Motions Introduced in Canada Since 1987. Vancouver: Abortions Rights Coalition of Canada.
Ackerman, Katrina. 2012. “‘Not in the Atlantic Provinces’: The Abortion Debate in New Brunswick, 1980-1987.” Acadiensis XLI, no.1 : 75-101.
Asal, Victor, Mitchell Brown, and Renee Gibson Figueroa. 2008. “Structure, Empowerment and the Liberalization of Cross-National Abortion Rights.” Politics and Gender 4, no. 2 : 265-284.
Bakan, Abigail and Daiva Stasiulus. 2005. Negotiating Citizenship: Migrant Women in Canada and the Global System. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bennett, Carolyn (Hon.). 2008. “The Politics of Abortion: The Work of a Politician.” In Of What Difference? Reflection on the Judgment and Abortion in Canada Today, 57-62. Toronto: University of Toronto Faculty of Law and National Abortion Federation.
Brodie, Janine. 1992. “Choice and No Choice in the House.” In The Politics of Abortion, edited by Janine Brodie, Shelley Gavigan, and Jane Jenson, 57-116. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Alister, and Bill Sullivan. 2005. “Abortion in Canada.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14, no. 3 : 287-291.
Burwell, Judy (former Director of the Fredericton Morgentaler Clinic). Interview by author. January 24, 2011. Recorded and transcribed by author. Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Canadian Medical Association (CMA). 1988. “CMA Policy: Induced Abortion.” Ottawa: CMA.
Canadians for Choice. Forthcoming. Away from home: How portable is provincial and territory health care insurance coverage when it comes to abortion services? Ottawa: Canadians for Choice.
CBC News. 2014. “Morgentaler abortion clinic in Fredericton to close.” CBC News, April 10.
CBC News. 2013a. “Doctor loses legal fight over abortion policy.” CBC News, May 17.
CBC News. 2013b. “Morgentaler’s death puts N.B. abortion lawsuit in limbo.” CBC News, May 30.
CBC News. 2011. “Tories defend N.B. women’s rights council cuts.” CBC News, March 23.
Dunsmuir, Mollie. 1998. “Abortion: Constitutional and Legal Developments.” Current Issue Review 89, no. 10E.
Eggertson, Laura. 2005. “Dosanjh to act on Canada Health Act violations.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 172, no. 7 : 862.
Eilperin, Juliet. 2013. “Abortion limits at state level return issue to the national state.” Washington Post, July 5.
Faludi, Susan. 1991. Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women. New York: Anchor Books.
Gavigan, Shelley. 1992. “Beyond Morgentaler: The Legal Regulation of Reproduction.” In The Politics of Abortion, edited by Janine Brodie, Shelley Gavigan, and Jane Jenson, 117-146. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Globe and Mail. 2014. “Morgentaler’s lawsuit over New Brunswick abortion funding dropped.” Globe and Mail, April 15.
Government of New Brunswick. 1984. New Brunswick Regulation 84-20 under the Medical Services Payment Act. Act. Fredericton: Government of New Brunswick.
Hansard Parliamentary Debates. 1989. Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick, May 5.
Hansard Parliamentary Debates. 1993. Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick, December 2.
Hansard Parliamentary Debates. 1994. Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick, February 22.
Hansard Parliamentary Debates. 2004. Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick, December 8.
Health Canada. 2010. Canada Health Act Annual Report 2009-2010. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
Huffington Post. 2012. “Mark Warawa’s Motion 408 Aimed At Condemning Sex-Selective Abortion.” Huffington Post, August 27.
Hughes, Jula (Professor of Law at the University of New Brunswick). Interview by author. January 17, 2011. Recorded and transcribed by author. Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Hughes, Jula. 2014. “The Closure of the Morgentaler Clinic and the Rule of Law in New Brunswick.” The Institute for Feminist Legal Studies at Osgoode. http://ifls.osgoode.yorku.ca/2014/04/nbabortion/.
Liptak, Adam. 2013. “Justices Reject Bid to Block Texas Law on Abortions.” The New York Times, November 19. A13.
Marshall, T. H., and Tom Bottomore. 1992. Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto.
Matthews, Scott. 2005. “The Political Foundations of Support for Same Sex Marriage in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38, no. 4 : 841-866.
Morgentaler Clinic, the. 2007. “Fees.” Last modified 2007. http://www.morgentalernb.ca/fees.html.
Moulton, Donalee. 2003. “New Brunswick assailed over ‘sexist’ abortion laws.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 169, no. 7 : 700.
Nossiff, Rosemary. 2007. “Gendered Citizenship: Women, Equality, and Abortion Policy.” New Political Science 29, no. 1 : 61-76.
Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 2008. “Beyond ‘A Woman’s Right to Chose’: Feminist Ideas about Reproductive Rights.” In The Reproductive Rights Reader: Law, Medicine, and the Construction of Motherhood, edited by Nancy Ehrenreich, 106-110. New York: New York University Press.
Price, Kimala. 2010. “What is Reproductive Justice?: How Women of Color Activists Are Redefining the Pro-Choice Paradigm.” Meridians: feminism, race, transnationalism 10, no. 2 : 42-65.
Reproductive Justice Network. “Help us ensure access to safe abortion in N.B.” Last modified 2014. https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/aoCmf/tx/63fJr3.
Richardson, Don. 2011. “N.B. stands firm on abortion policy.” The Daily Gleaner, January 30.
Richer, Karine. 2008. Abortion in Canada: Twenty Years After R. v. Morgentaler. Ottawa: Library of Parliament.
Saurette, Paul, and Kelly Gordon. 2013. “Arguing Abortion: The New Anti-Abortion Discourse in Canada.” The Canadian Journal of Political Science 46, no. 1 : 157-185.
Schwartzman, Lisa. 2002. “Feminist analyses of oppression and the discourse of ‘rights’: A response to Wendy Brown.” Social Theory and Practice 28, no. 3 : 465-479.
Sethna, Christabelle, Beth Palmer, Katrina Ackerman, and Nancy Janovicek. 2013. “Choice Interrupted: Travel and Inequality of Access to Abortion Services Since the 1960s.” Labour/Le Travail 71 : 29-48.
Smith, Andrea. 2005. “Beyond Pro-Choice Versus Pro-Life: Women of Color and Reproductive Justice.” NSWA Journal. 17, no. 1 : 121-140.
West, Robin. 2009. “From Choice to Reproductive Justice: De-Constitutionalizing Abortion Rights.” The Yale Law Journal 118, no. 7 : 1394-1432.
Woodworth, Stephen. 2012. “Motion 312.” Last modified 2013. http://stephenwoodworth.ca/motion-312/motion-312-full-text/.
Zakiya, Luna, and Kristin Luker. 2013. “Reproductive Justice.” The Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9 : 327-352.
Cases Cited
New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench. 2004. Morgentaler v New Brunswick, N.B.Q.B. No. 139.
New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench. 2008. Morgentaler v New Brunswick, N.B.Q.B. No. 258.
Court of Appeal of New Brunswick. 2009. Morgentaler v New Brunswick, N.B.C.A. No. 26.
New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench. 1989. Morgentaler v. New Brunswick (Attorney General),
N.B.Q.B.. No. 311.
New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench. 1994. Morgentaler v. New Brunswick, N.B.Q.B.. No. 302.
New Brunswick Labour and Employment Board. 2001. A.A. v Province of New Brunswick (Health Department), N.B.L.E.B. No. HR-005-10.
Supreme Court of Canada. 1988. R. v. Morgentaler, 1 S.C.R. 30.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs qui publient dans cette revue acceptent les conditions suivantes:
1. Les auteurs conservent les droits d’auteur et accordent le droit de première publication à la revue. L’œuvre est simultanément sous licence internationale Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 qui permet à d’autres personnes de la partager en citant dans les remerciements l’auteur de l’œuvre et sa publication initiale dans cette revue.
2. Les auteurs savent que les articles publiés dans Atlantis sont indexés et disponibles par le biais de divers outils de recherche universitaires et professionnels, y compris, entre autres, Erudit.
3. Les auteurs peuvent conclure des ententes contractuelles supplémentaires et distinctes pour la distribution non exclusive de la version de l’article publiée par la revue (c’est-à-dire, l’afficher dans un dépôt institutionnel ou la publier dans un livre), en signalant qu’elle a été initialement publiée dans cette revue.
4. Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à prépublier leur œuvre, c’est-à-dire à la publier en ligne (dans un dépôt institutionnel ou sur leur site Web, par exemple) avant et pendant le processus de soumission. Cela peut conduire à des échanges productifs, ainsi qu’à ce que le travail publié soit cité plus tôt et plus souvent. Renseignez-vous davantage ici sur la prépublication.
