Imag(in)ing the Invisible
Keywords:
biomedicine, chronic illness, digital diagnosis, endometriosis, futurity, medical imaging technologiesAbstract
This commentary politicizes the relational-technical economy of biomedicine and the future it forecasts for feminized bodies with chronic illnesses. As digital medical imaging technologies develop, visualizations of disease are becoming more sophisticated. I begin by critically considering the implications this has for feminized bodies with chronic illnesses through the example of endometriosis, a common chronic pain disease that is not well understood within the biomedical paradigm. Enhanced imaging technologies promise to illuminate previously-unknowable aspects of disease pathophysiology, but what future is such technological progress enabling, and for whom? Through a critical intersectional lens, it becomes evident that the biomedical-technological future imag(in)es particular bodies, in particular places, and towards particular, but not unfamiliar ends. Enhancing abilities to visualize disease through digital technologies within a biomedical paradigm does not require us to look differently, which may be precisely what is needed. Thus, drawing theoretically on the work of bell hooks as well as critical feminist disability studies scholarship, I kindle the fire of a critical intersectional politic that transforms biomedical-technological ways of seeing the feminized body with chronic illness. Such a politic not only offers the possibility to imagine alternate futurities, but also contributes to their tangible realization.
References
Brown, R. n.d. “Histopathology.” Factsheet. The Royal College of Pathologists. www.rcpath.org/discover-pathology/news/fact-sheets/histopathology.html.
Becker, Christian M. et al. 2022. “ESHRE Guideline: Endometriosis.” Human Reproduction Open 2022(2). hoac009. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac009.
Burfoot, A. In press. “Visual Culture and Techno-medical Science.” In The Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Visual Culture – Vol 3 Visual Culture – Digitisations, Transformations, and Futures, edited by M. Hand, B. Sandywell, and V. Szabo. London: Bloomsbury.
Allaire, Catherine, Mohamed A. Bedaiwy, and Paul J. Yong. 2023. “Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 195(10):E363–371.
Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. 2019. “Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject.” Television & New Media 20(4):336–49. doi: 10.1177/1527476418796632.
Dungate, Brie, Dwayne R. Tucker, Emma Goodwin, and Paul J. Yong. 2024. “Assessing the Utility of artificial intelligence in endometriosis: Promises and pitfalls.” Women’s Health 20:1–12. doi: 10.1177/17455057241248.
Elam, J. S., M. F. Glasser, M. P. Harms, S. N. Sotiropoulos, J. L. R. Andersson, G. C. Burgess, S. W. Curtiss, R. Oostenveld, et al. 2021. “The Human Connectome Project: A Retrospective.” NeuroImage 244:118543.
Ellis, Katherine, Deborah Munro, and Jennifer Clarke. 2022. “Endometriosis Is Undervalued: A Call to Action.” Frontiers in Global Women’s Health 3:902371. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.902371.
hooks, b. 1995. Killing Rage: Ending Racism. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Jones, Cara E. 2021. “Queering Gendered Disabilities.” Journal of Lesbian Studies 25(3):195–211. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2020.1778852.
_____. 2016. “The Pain of Endo Existence: Toward a Feminist Disability Studies Reading of Endometriosis.” Hypatia 31(3):554–71. doi: 10.1111/hypa.12248.
Kafer, A. 2013. Feminist Queer Crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Levy, Adrian R., Katherine M. Osenenko, Greta Lozano-Ortega, Robert Sambrook, Mark Jeddi, Serge Bélisle, and Robert L. Reid. 2011. “Economic Burden of Surgically Confirmed Endometriosis in Canada.” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 33(8):830–37. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34986-6.
Lindeman, T. 2023. BLEED: Destroying Myths and Misogyny in Endometriosis Care. Toronto, ON: ECW Press.
Lorde, A. 1984. “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.” In: Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches, 110-114. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
Naddaf, M. 2023, March 10. “Gigantic Map of Fly Brain is a First for a Complex Animal.” Nature. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00709-7.
Nahirney, P. C., & Tremblay, M. E. 2021. “Brain Ultrastructure: Putting the Pieces Together.”Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9:629503.
Nezhat, Camran, Farr Nezhat, and Ceana Nezhat. 2012. “Endometriosis: Ancient Disease, Ancient Treatments.” Fertility and Sterility 98(6):S1–62. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.001.
Przybylo, E. and B. Fahs. 2018. “Feels and Flows: On the Realness of Menstrual Pain and Cripping Menstrual Chronicity.” Feminist Formations 30(1):206–229.
Seabrook, S. and A. Cattapan. 2023, December 4. “Endometriosis: It’s time to change the pattern of pain, stigma and barriers to diagnosis and treatment.” The Conversation. theconversation.com/endometriosis-its-time-to-change-the-pattern-of-pain-stigma-and-barriers-to-diagnosis-and-treatment-217881.
Sins Invalid. 2015. “10 Principles of Disability Justice.” Sins Invalid. www.sinsinvalid.org/blog/10-principles-of-disability-justice.
Tuzcu, Pinar. 2021. “Decoding the Cybaltern: Cybercolonialism and Postcolonial Intellectuals in the Digital Age.” Postcolonial Studies 24(4):514–27. doi: 10.1080/13688790.2021.1985264.
Wendell, S. 2014. “Unhealthy Disabled: Treating Chronic Illnesses as Disabilities.” In: The Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard J. Davis (4th ed.), 161–173. New York, NY: Routledge.
Witthöft, M. 2013. “Pathophysiology.” In: Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine, edited by M.D. Gellman and J.R. Turner, 1443–1445. New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_43
Wahl, Kate J., Yong, Paul J., Bridge-Cook, Philippa, and Allaire, Catherine. 2021. “Endometriosis in Canada: It Is Time for Collaboration to Advance Patient-Oriented, Evidence-Based Policy, Care, and Research” [Brief Communication]. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 43(1):88–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.05.009.
Whelan, Emma. 2007. “‘No One Agrees Except for Those of Us Who Have It’: Endometriosis Patients as an Epistemological Community.” Sociology of Health & Illness 29(7):957–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01024.x.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elizabeth S. Cameron

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are aware that articles published in Atlantis are indexed and made available through various scholarly and professional search tools, including but not limited to Erudit.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to preprint their work, that is, post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Read more on preprints here.