What Girls Want
An Affective Reading of Activist Girls and Their Relationships with Their Mothers and Mother Figures
Keywords:
activism, girls’ studies, interviewing, mother-daughter relationshipsAbstract
This paper is a critical reflection on the fieldwork and analysis stage of my dissertation project on activist girls. My project explores how an intergenerational lens can be critically applied to the actions and motivations of activist girls and asks how contemporary girls negotiate and feel about their activism, their relationships with their mothers and communities, and their imaginings for a feminist future. Between 2021 and 2022, I conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with ten activist girls (aged 11-20) and their mothers/mother figures in a series of one-on-one and paired interviews. In this paper, I reflect on the affective landscape that emerged when interviewing girls, not only about their mothers but also with their mothers, and what this methodology might offer to the field of girls’ studies. I engage with how daughters and mothers negotiate, express, and sometimes struggle to articulate their desires for the future and their relationship in the context of the paired interviews and how both the subject matter and method of this study posed challenges for me as a researcher.
Metrics
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Second edition. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
alt, Joyce E. Everet, Laverne D. Marks, and Jean F. Clarke-Mitchell. 2016. “A Qualitative Study of the Black Mother-Daughter Relationship: Lessons Learned About Self-Esteem, Coping, and Resilience.” Journal of Black Studies 47 (4): 334–50.
Bailey, Moya. 2021. Misogynoir Transformed. New York, USA: New York University Press.
Benigno, Tina Belinda. 2021. “Girls and Activism in a Neoliberal Time: How Teen Girls from Toronto Negotiate Care, Activism, and Extraordinary Girlhood.” Global Studies of Childhood, July, 20436106211027341. doi.org/10.1177/20436106211027341.
Bent, Emily. 2016. “Making It Up: Intergenerational Activism and the Ethics of Empowering Girls.” Girlhood Studies 9 (3): 105–21.
Berlant, Lauren Gail. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Brown, Lyn Mikel. 2016. Powered by Girl : A Field Guide for Supporting Youth Activists. Boston: Beacon Press.
Brown, Lyn Mikel., and Carol Gilligan. 1992. Meeting at the Crossroads: Women’s Psychology and Girls’ Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, Ruth Nicole. 2009. Black Girlhood Celebration : Toward a Hip-Hop Feminist Pedagogy. Mediated Youth, v. 5. New York: Peter Lang.
Cook, Courtney. 2020. “Towards a Fairer Future: An Activist Model of Black Girl Leadership.” Girlhood Studies 13 (2): 52–68. doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2020.130206.
Coulter, N. (2021). “Frappés, friends, and fun”: Affective labor and the cultural industry of girlhood. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(3), 487–500. doi.org/10.1177/1469540518806954
Coulter, Natalie, and Kristine Moruzi. 2022. “Woke Girls: From The Girl’s Realm to Teen Vogue.” Feminist Media Studies 22 (4): 765–79. doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1736119.
Crookston, Shara, and Monica Klonowski. 2021. “Intersectional Feminism and Social Justice in Teen Vogue.” Girlhood Studies 14 (3): 37–54. doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2021.140304.
Cvetkovich, Ann. 2012. Depression a Public Feeling. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
deAnda, Carly, and Patricia Geist-Martin. 2018. “Memory as Insight: Navigating the Complexities of Generational Mother–Daughter Relationships.” Qualitative Inquiry 24 (6): 403–12.
Finney, Sandrina de. 2014. “Under the Shadow of Empire: Indigenous Girls’ Presencing as Decolonizing Force.” Girlhood Studies 7 (1): 8–26. doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2014.070103.
——. 2017. “Indigenous Girls’ Resilience in Settler States: Honouring Body and Land Sovereignty.” Agenda (Durban) 31 (2): 10–21.doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2017.1366179.
Fouquier, Katherine Ferrell. 2011. “The Concept of Motherhood Among Three Generations of African American Women: Concept of Motherhood Among African American Women.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship 43 (2): 145–53.
Halliday, Aria, ed. 2019. The Black Girlhood Studies Collection. Toronto: Women’s Press.
Harris, Anita. 2004. Future Girl: Young Women in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
____. 2008. Next Wave Cultures: Feminism, Subcultures, Activism. Critical Youth Studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Johnson, Donna Marie, and Alice E. Ginsberg. 2015. Difficult Dialogues about Twenty-First-Century Girls. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Mandrona, April. 2016. “Ethical Practice and the Study of Girlhood.” Girlhood Studies 9 (3): 3–19. doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2016.090302.
Mitchell, Claudia, and Jacqueline Reid-Walsh. 2013. “Making Method in Girlhood Studies.” Girlhood Studies 6 (1): 1–6. doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2013.060101.
Nunn, Nia Michelle. 2018. “Super-Girl: Strength and Sadness in Black Girlhood.” Gender and Education 30 (2): 239–58. doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1225013.
Rastogi, Mudita, and Karen S Wampler. 1999. “Adult Daughters’ Perceptions of the Mother-Daughter Relationship: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.” Family Relations 48 (3): 327–36.
Reimer, Vanessa, and Sarah Sahagian, eds. 2013. Mother of Invention : How Our Mothers Influenced Us as Feminist Academics and Activists. Mother of Invention : How Our Mothers Influenced Us as Feminist Academics and Activists. Bradford, Ontario: Demeter Press.
Sharpe, Christina. 2023. Ordinary Notes. New York: Knopf Canada.
Smith, A. L. 2019. “Theorizing Black Girlhood.” In The Black Girlhood Studies Collection, edited by Aria Halliday, 21–44. Toronto: Women’s Press.
Smooth, Wendy, and Elaine Richardson. 2019. “Role Models Matter: Black Girls and Political Leadership Possibilities in The Black Girlhood Studies Collection.” In The Black Girlhood Studies Collection, edited by Aria Halliday, 131–56. Toronto: Women’s Press.
Stewart, Kathleen. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Durham: Duke University Press. doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1220j7h.
Swindle, Monica. 2011. “Feeling Girl, Girling Feeling: An Examination of ‘Girl’ as Affect.” Rhizomes 22:47. 1–47.
Taft, Jessica K. 2006. “‘I’m Not a Politics Person’: Teenage Girls, Oppositional Consciousness, and the Meaning of Politics.” Politics & Gender. 2 (3): 329-352. doi:10.1017/S1743923X06060119.
____. 2011. Rebel Girls : Youth Activism and Social Change across the Americas. Rebel Girls : Youth Activism and Social Change across the Americas. New York: New York University Press.
____. 2017. “Teenage Girls’ Narratives of Becoming Activists.” Contemporary Social Science 12 (1–2): 27–39.
____. 2020. “Hopeful, Harmless, and Heroic.” Girlhood Studies 13 (2): 1–17. doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2020.130203.
Torres, Rose Ann. 2011. “Indigenous Spirituality, Activism and Feminism in the Life of My Mother.” Canadian Woman Studies 29 (1–2): 135–39.
Tuck, Eve. 2010. “Breaking up with Deleuze: Desire and Valuing the Irreconcilable.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (5): 635–50. doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500633.
Winstanley, Sarah, and Alexe Bernier. 2022. “‘Who Were You?’: Temporality and Intergenerational Empathy in Community Girlhood Studies.” Girlhood Studies 15 (3): 35–51. doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2022.150305.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hannah Maitland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are aware that articles published in Atlantis are indexed and made available through various scholarly and professional search tools, including but not limited to Erudit.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to preprint their work, that is, post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Read more on preprints here.
