Playing Speculative Cat's Cradle
Reckoning with the Feminist Potentialities of Twine
Keywords:
Twine, speculative fabulation, feminism, collaboration, creative practice, nonlinear storytellingAbstract
Inspired by the feminist possibilities within digital technologies and acknowledging their limitations, the authors examine the collaborative process of creating Twine workshops for three conferences, the International Communications Association, the Canadian Communications Association, and the Open Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association. The workshops engaged with Twine as an interactive tool for reckoning with narratives of Empire through feminist, nonlinear, non-normative, creative expression and explored how embracing the ethos of Twine might enable collaborative analog ideation. In Twine, we see ways to bifurcate from libertarian normalizations of individualism and instead posit “playing with speculative cat’s cradle” as a prompt from Donna Haraway to collectively reckon with, re-imagine, and co-experiment with burgeoning forms of digital expression to shape otherwise thinking and future possibilities. Drawing from our respective fields of expertise (digital cultures; communications; history; gender, feminist, and women’s studies; environmental studies; writing and rhetoric; game studies), we examine the opportunities and limitations of Twine and reflect on the process of forming a feminist collaboration. We highlight processes and relationships rather than solely focusing on outcomes as a deliberate feminist intervention against neo-liberal results-oriented approaches to research and suggest that a component of feminist collaboration is being open to nonlinear, ongoing, and iterative work together.
References
Abraham, Benjamin J. 2022. Digital Games After Climate Change. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave.
Ahmed, Sara. 2004. “Affective Economies.” Social Text 79(2, 2):117-139.
Anthropy, Anna. 2012. Rise of the Videogame Zinesters. Seven Stories Press.
______. 2013. Queers at the End of the World. https://w.itch.io/end-of-the-world.
Arora, Payal. 2019. “Decolonizing Privacy Studies.” Television & New Media 20(4): 366-378.
Back, Les, and Nirmal Puwar. 2012. “A Manifesto for Live Methods: Provocations and Capacities.” The Sociological Review (Keele) 60(S1): 6–17.
Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology. Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford: Polity Press.
Chan, Anita S. 2013. Networking Peripheries. Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chess, Shira. 2020. Play Like a Feminist. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cote, Amanda C. and Brandon C. Harris. 2023. “The Cruel Optimism of ‘Good Crunch: How Game Industry Discourses Perpetuate Unsustainable Labor Practices.” New Media & Society 25(3): 609-627.
Couldry, Nick and Ulises A. Mejias. 2018. “Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject.” Television & New Media 20(4): 336-349.
Cox, Daniel and Klimas, Chris (eds). 2024. The Twine Cookbook. Interactive Fiction Technology Foundation.
Crows, Crows, Crows. 2016. The Temple of No. https://crowscrowscrows.itch.io/the-temple-of-no
Dovey, Jon and Helen W. Kennedy. 2006. Game Cultures: Computer Games as New Media. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Dyer-Witheford, Nick and Greig de Peuter. 2009. Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Edwards, Paul N. 2003. “Industrial Genders: Soft/Hard.” In Gender and Technology: A Reader, edited by Nina Lerman, Ruth Oldgenziel, and Arwen P. Mohun. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Evans, Sarah. 2020. “En(Twine)d: A Feminist Software Analysis.” In Hybrid Play: Crossing Boundaries in Game Design, Players Identities and Play Spaces, edited by Adriana de Souza e Silva and Ragan Glover-Rijkse. Routledge.
Fron, Janine, Tracy Fullerton, Morie Jacquelyn Ford, and Pearce Celia. 2007. “The Hegemony of Play.” Paper presented at the Situated Play- Digital Games Research Conference, Tokyo.
Haraway, Donna. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge.
_____. 2011. “Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture’s Generations: Taking Care of Unexpected Country.” Australian Humanities Review 50(5): 96-118.
_____. 2021. “SF: Science Fiction, Speculative Fabulation, String Figures, So Far.” Ada New Media, no. 3.
Harvey, Alison. 2014. “Twine’s Revolution: Democratization, Depoliticization, and the Queering of Game Design. GAME: The Italian Journal of Game Studies 3: 95-107.
_____. 2019. “Feminist Interventions for Better Futures of Digital Games.” In Playing Utopia: Futures in Digital Games, 211-234, edited by Benjamin Beil, Gundolf S. Freyermuth, and Hanns Christian Schmidt. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Harvey, Alison and Tamara Shepherd. 2016. “When Passion isn’t Enough: Gender, Affect and Credibility in Digital Games Design.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 20(5): 492–508.
Hicks, Mar 2017. Programmed Inequality: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and Lost Its Edge in Computing. MIT Press.
Kuo, R. 2020. Conduits of (Im) Possibility: Mediating Solidarities. Doctoral dissertation, New York University.
Lee-Popham, Anna. 2021, April 17. “Tonight May Be.” Canthius.
Lewis, Jason Edward, Noelani Arista, Archer Pechawis, and Suzanne Kite. 2018. “Making Kin with the Machines.” Journal of Design and Science. doi.org/10.21428/bfafd97b
Livingston, Ira. 2021. “Nonlinearity, Writing, and Creative Process.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and Mathematics, edited by Robert Tubbs, Alice Jenkins, and Nina Engelhardt. Springer Books.
Long, Ziyu, Jasmine R. Linabary, Patrice M. Buzzanell, Ashton Mouton, and Ranjani L. Rao. 2020. “Enacting Everyday Feminist Collaborations: Reflexive Becoming, Proactive Improvisation and Co‐learning Partnerships.” Gender, Work, and Organization 27(4): 487–506.
Lothian, Alexis and Amanda Phillips. 2013. “Can Digital Humanities Mean Transformative Critique?” Journal of E-Media Studies 3(1): 1–25.
Lupton, Deborah. 2000. The Embodied Computer / User. In The Cybercultures Reader, edited by D. Bell and B. Kennedy. London: Routledge
Lutz, Helma, Maria-Teresa Herrera Vivar, and Linda Supik. 2011. “Framing Intersectionality: An Introduction.” In Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-Faceted Concept in Gender Studies, edited by Helma Lutz, Maria-Teresa Herrera Vivar, and Linda Supik. Routledge.
Lynch, Teresa, Jessica E. Tompkins, Irene van Driel, and Niki Fritz. 2016. “Sexy, Strong, and Secondary: A Content Analysis of Female Characters in Video Games across 31 Years.” Journal of Communication 66(4): 564–584.
McIlwain, Charlton D. 2019. Black Software: The Internet and Racial Justice, from the AfroNet to Black Lives Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Milan, Stefania. M and Emiliano Treré. 2019. “Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism.” Television & New Media 20(4): 319–335.
Mukherjee, Souvik. 2019. “Age of Empires: Postcolonialism.” In How to Play Video Games, edited by Matthew Thomas Payne and Nina B. Huntemann. New York: New York University Press.
Nakamura, Lisa. 2011. “Economies of Digital Production in East Asia: iPhone Girls and the Transnational Circuits of Cool.” Media Fields Journal 2: 1-10.
_____. 2014. “Indigenous Circuits: Navajo Women and the Racialization of Early Electronic Manufacture.” American Quarterly 66(4): 919-941.
Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.
Nooney, Laine. 2013. “A Pedestal, A Table, A Love Letter: Archaeologies of Gender in Videogame History.” Game Studies 13(2).
Pérez-Latorre, Óliver and Merce Oliva. 2019. “Video Games, Dystopia, and Neoliberalism: The Case of BioShock Infinite.” Games and Culture 14(7-8): 781-800.
Philips, Kavita. 2021. “The Internet Will Be Decolonized.” In Your Computer Is On Fire, edited by Thomas S. Mullaney, Benjamin Peters, Mar Hicks, and Kavita Philips. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Porpentine 2012. Howling Dogs. https://xrafstar.monster/games/twine/howlingdogs/
Preda, Marian, and Ștefania Matei. 2023. “Teaching Time as a Social Imaginary. Using Speculative Fabulation to Deconstruct the Hegemonic Temporalities of Modernity.” Time & Society 32(3): 318-335.
Puig de la Bellacasa, María. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Sharma, Sarah and Rianka Singh, eds. 2022. Re-Understanding Media: Feminist Extensions of Marshall McLuhan. Duke University Press.
Sicart, Miguel. 2014. Play Matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stallabras, Julian. 1993. “Just Gaming: Allegory and Economy in Computer Games.” New Left Review 198 (March/April): 83-106.
Steele, Catherine Knight. 2021. Digital Black Feminism. New York: NYU Press.
Trammell, Aaron 2023. Repairing Play: A Black Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Turkle, Sherry 1984. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Tuzcu, Pinar. 2016. “Allow Access to Location?: Digital Feminist Geographies.” Feminist Media Studies 16(1): 150–163.
Weststar, Johanna and Marie-Josée Legault. 2018. “Women’s Experiences on the Path to a Career in Game Development.” In Feminism in Play, edited by Kishonna L. Gray, Gerald Voorhees, and Emma Vossen. Palgrave Macmillan.
Zimmerman, Eric and Heather Chaplin. 2013. “Manifesto: The 21st Century Will Be Defined By Games.” Kotaku. Available online: http://kotaku.com/manifesto-the-21st-century-will-be-defined-by-games-1275355204
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anna Lee-Popham, Sarah York-Bertram, Aparajita Bhandari, Laurence Butet-Roch, Sarah Choukah, Alison Harvey

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are aware that articles published in Atlantis are indexed and made available through various scholarly and professional search tools, including but not limited to Erudit.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to preprint their work, that is, post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Read more on preprints here.




