“I don’t want to be a burden on others”
Perspectives of "Young-old" Thai Women on Self-reliance, Wellness, and Aging
Keywords:
aging, self-reliance, wellness, intersectional identities, Global SouthAbstract
This article examines the perspectives of middle- and upper-class “young-old” women (aged 60 to 69) in Thailand on “wellness” amidst the country’s rapidly aging population. Drawing upon findings from my interviews with sixteen older women, it explores how self-reliance has become central to their pursuit of decent physical and mental health. Participants strived to maintain their health, preserve mobility, and reduce dependence on family members. At the same time, some served as caregivers for their families in a culture that emphasizes familial interdependence. Additionally, this paper analyzes how “mental wellness” is framed within self-reliance, shaped by Buddhist teachings and neoliberal ideals, as these women navigate life transitions and sustain their well-being amidst the disruptions of COVID-19. The study further demonstrates their rising concerns and demands for essential resources for their wellness, including health insurance, professional caregiving, and adequate housing, in the absence of sufficient public welfare. The paper offers a nuanced understanding of self-reliance and wellness in later life and promotes interventions to support older individuals. It does so by foregrounding the classed, gendered, and culturally specific experiences of aging women in the Global South, a topic rarely studied in fields such as gerontology and feminist studies.
References
Arunmas, Phusadee. 2023. “Govt Blames Cost for New Payout Rules on Pensions.” Bangkok Post, August 16. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/2630107.
Chabot, Roger. 2018. “Life is Suffering: Thrownness, Duhkha, Gaps, and the Origin of Existential-Spiritual Needs for Information.” Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS/Actes du congrès annuel de l’ACSI, July. https://doi.org/10.29173/cais973
Clarke, Victoria. Virginia Braun and Nikki Hayfield. 2015. “Thematic Analysis” in Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, edited by Jonathan A. Smith. SAGE Publications. 2015.
Damrongplasit, Kannika, and Glenn Melnick. 2024. “Utilisation, Out-of-Pocket Payments and Access Before and After COVID-19: Thailand’s Universal Health Coverage Scheme.” BMJ Global Health 9(5): e015179. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015179
Duncan, Grant. 2000. “Mind-Body Dualism and the Biopsychosocial Model of Pain: What Did Descartes Really Say?” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(4): 485–513. doi.org/10.1076/0360-5310 (200008)25:4;1-a;ft485.
Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). n.d. “Demographic Change in Asia Pacific.” https://www.population-trends-asiapacific.org/data/THA.
Fan, Ruiping. 2007. “Which Care? Whose Responsibility? And Why Family? A Confucian Account of Long-Term Care for the Elderly.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32(5): 495–517. doi.org/10.1080/03605310701626331
Gallagher, Shaun, and Dan Zahavi. 2020. The Phenomenological Mind. Routledge.
Gill, Rosalind, and Shani Orgad. 2018. “The Amazing Bounce-Backable Woman: Resilience and the Psychological Turn in Neoliberalism.” Sociological Research Online 23 (2): 477–495 doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769673
Gilligan, Carol. 2003. “Hearing the Difference: Theorizing Connection.” Anuario de Psicología 34(2): 155–161
Haraway, Donna. 1997. “Situated Knowledge: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” In Space, Gender, Knowledge: Feminist Readings, edited by Linda McDowell and Joanne Sharp, Routledge.
Hedelin, Birgitta, and Margaretha Strandmark. 2009. “The Meaning of Mental Health from Elderly Women’s Perspectives: A Basis for Health Promotion.” Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 37(1): 7–14. doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6163.2001.tb00611.x
hooks, bell. 2018. All about love: New visions. William Morrow Paperbacks.
Jenmana, Thanasak, and Amory Gethin. 2019. “Extreme Inequality, Democratisation and Class Struggles in Thailand.” WID World Issue Brief (1): 1–9. https://wid.world/document/extreme-inequality-democratisation-and-class-struggles-in-thailand-wid-world-issue-brief-2019-1
Jensantikul, Nipapan. 2022. “The Promotion of Quality of Life for the Elderly of the Local Administrative Organizations in Khon Kaen Province.” Interdisciplinary Research Review 17(3): 1–6.
Jumnianpol, Surangrut, Nithi Nuangjamnong, Thananon Buathong, and Montakarn Chimmamee. 2023. “Aging Society in Thailand during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” In Human Security and Empowerment in Asia: Beyond the Pandemic edited by Surangrut Jumnianpol, Nithi Nuangjamnong, Montakarn Chimmamee, Thananon Buathong. Routledge.
Katz, Stephen, and Toni Calasanti. 2015. “Critical Perspectives on Successful Aging: Does It ‘Appeal More Than It Illuminates’?” The Gerontologist 55(1): 26–33. doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu080
King, Neal, and Toni Calasanti. 2006. “Empowering the Old: Critical Gerontology and Anti-Aging in a Global Context.” In Aging, Globalization, and Inequality: The New Critical Gerontology edited by Jan Baars, Dale Dannefer, Chris Phillipson, and Alan Walker. Routledge.
Knodel, John, Bussarawan Teerawichitchainan, and Wiraporn Pothisiri. 2018. “Caring for Thai Older Persons with Long-Term Care Needs.” Journal of Aging and Health 30(10): 1516–1535.
Kohlbacher, Florian, and Emmanuel Chéron. 2012. “Understanding ‘Silver’ Consumers Through Cognitive Age, Health Condition, Financial Status, and Personal Values: Empirical Evidence from the World’s Most Mature Market, Japan.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 11(3): 179–188.
Kvale, Steinar and Svend Brinkmann. 2009. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed. Sage Publications.
Lertchoosakul, Kanokrat. 2023. “The Rise of the Youth Movement in Thailand: The Double Layers of the Intergenerational Political Clash Between the Cold War Boomers’ Gerontocratic State and the Zoomers.” LSE. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/seac/2023/09/25/the-rise-of-the-youth-movement-in-thailand-the-double-layers-of-the-intergenerational-political-clash-between-the-cold-war-boomers-gerontocratic-state-and-the-zoomers/
Limanonda, Bhassorn. 1995. “Families in Thailand: Beliefs and Realities.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 26(1): 67–82. doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.26.1.67
Neilson, Brett. 2006. “Anti-aging Cultures, Biopolitics, and Globalisation.” Cultural Studies Review 12(2): 149–164. doi.org/10.5130/csr.v12i2.2341
Niamsri, Patcharee, and Pimpawun Boonmongkon. 2017. “Bio-Power, Medical Gaze and Negotiation: Narrative Experiences of Anti-Aging Practices Among Thai Women.” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38(1): 62–67. doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.03.001
Paulson, Susan, and Carla Willig. 2008. “Older Women and Everyday Talk about the Aging Body.” Journal of Health Psychology 13(1): 106–120. doi.org/10.1177/1359105307084316
Pitakchinnapong, Nipawan, and Douglas Rhein. 2019. “Exploration of the Causation of Stigmatization of Mental Illness in Thailand: Perceptions of Thai University Students.” Computers in Human Behavior 20(2): 7–9. 24
Radtke, H. Lorraine, Jenna Young, and Janneke van Mens-Verhulst. 2016. “Aging, Identity, and Women: Constructing the Third Age.” Women and Therapy 39(1-2): 86–105. doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2016.1116321
Rottenberg, Catherine. 2022. “Women Who Work: The Limits of the Neoliberal Feminist Paradigm” In The Routledge Companion to Marketing and Feminism edited by Pauline Maclaran, Lorna Stevens, and Olga Kravets. Routledge.
Rowe, John W., and Robert L. Kahn. 1997. “Successful Aging.” The Gerontologist 37(4): 433–40. doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.4.433
Segal, Lynne. 2013. Out of Time: The Pleasures and the Perils of Aging. Verso Books.
Shimoni, Shir. 2023. “Happy and Entrepreneurial within the ‘Here and Now’: The Constitution of the Neoliberal Female Aging Subject.” Feminist Media Studies. 23(1): 344–359. doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1979067
Sontag, Susan. 1997. “The Double Standard of Aging.” In The Other Within Us: Feminist Explorations of Women and Aging edited by Marilyn Pearsall. Routledge.
Soonthornchaiya, Rangsiman. 2020. “Resilience for Psychological Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic on Older Adults in Thailand.” HSOA Journal of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine 6(2). doi.org/10.24966/GGM-8662/100053
TGRI (The Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development Institute). 2022. “Situation of the Thai Elderly.” www.researchgate.net/publication 374539711_Situation_of_the_Thai_Older_Persons_2022
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2018. “Why Aging and Older Persons Matter for Development” in Aging, Older Persons and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 11–13.
_____. 2022. “Thai Women’s Unpaid Care and Domestic Work and the Impact on Decent Employment.” www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-03UNDP_domesticwork_draft14_EN_without_Bleed_0.pdf
UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund). 2017. “Extended Families Now Biggest Group in Society: UNFPA.” https://thailand.unfpa.org/en/news/extended-families-now-biggest-group-society-unfpa-0.
Vasara, Paula, Anna Simola, and Antero Olakivi. 2023. “The Trouble with Vulnerability: Narrating Aging During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Aging Studies 64: 101106. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101106
Wilson, Kalpana. 2015. “Towards a Radical Re-appropriation: Gender, Development, and Neoliberal Feminism.” Development and Change 46(4): 803–832. doi.org/10.1111/dech.12176
Wodak, Ruth. 2004. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Qualitative Research Practice edited by Clive Seale, David Silverman, Jaber F. Gubrium, and Giampietro Gobo. doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191.d17
Wongsala, Manothai, Els-Marie Anbäcken, and Sirpa Rosendahl. 2021. “Active Aging–Perspectives on Health, Participation, and Security Among Older Adults in Northeastern Thailand—A Qualitative Study.” BMC Geriatrics 21: 1–10. doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01981-2
World Health Organization (WHO). 2025. Thailand [Country Overview]. https://www.who.int/data/gho/whs-annex/
Wuthithanakul, Aitsanart. 2021. “9 in 10 Thais Still Reject Nursing Homes Despite Aging Population.” Ipsos Thailand. www.ipsos.com/en-th/9-10-thais-still-reject-nursing-homes-despite-aging-population.
Zachau, Ulrich. 2016. “Aging in Thailand—How to Live Long and Prosper.” World Bank Blogs. blogs.worldbank.org/en/eastasiapacific/aging-in-thailand-how-to-live-long-and-prosper
Archawanichkul, Krittiya, and Pimpawal Boonmongkul. 1996. “รื้อสร้างองค์ความคิดของผู้หญิงกับสุขภาพ.” Health Systems Research Institute 4(1): 3–8. kb.hsri.or.th/dspace/handle/11228/1017
Bangkok Asset Intergroup. n.d. “รวม 10 บ้านพักคนชรา อยู่อย่างโสดๆ ต้องใช้เงินเท่าไหร่.” Bangkokassets.com. . www.bangkokassets.com/articledetail/465/รวม_10_บ้านพักคนชรา_อยู่อย่างโสดๆ_ต้องใช้เงินเท่าไหร่%3F
DOP (Department of Older Persons. 2019. “Measures to implement national agenda: 6 Sustainable, 4 Change”. Ministry of Social Development and Human Security, Thailand. www.dop.go.th/download/knowledge/th1551432930-155_0.pdf
_____2020. “ออมเงินอย่างไรให้อุ่นใจ เมื่อถึงวัยเกษียณ (สลก.).” www.dop.go.th/th/know/13/1510
Kaewbuadee, Nitchakarn, and Wiraporn Pothisiri. 2019. “Delaying Age at Birth of Ever-Married Women in Thailand: Situation, Trend and Determinants.” Srinakharinwirot Research and Development Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 22(11): 57–74.
OIC (Office of Insurance Commission. n.d. “การประกันชีวิต.” www.oic.or.th/th/life-insurance.
NESDC (Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council). 2022. “รายงานภาวะเศรษฐกิจในประเทศปี 2566.” www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_news.php?nid=12567.
Santisombat, Yot. 2005. “การทำความเข้าใจ ‘เพศสถานะ’และ ‘เพศวิถี’ในสังคมไทย.” In เพศสถานะและเพศวิถีในสังคมไทย, edited by Amara Pongsapich, Chulalongkorn University Press
TGRI (The Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development Institute). 2021. “เผยผลสำรวจคนแก่ไร้ญาติ เพียงร้อยละ 5 เท่านั้น ที่มีกำลังทรัพย์จ้างเอกชนดูแลตัวเอง.” thaitgri.org/?p=39648.
Wibunsilaprot, Phrakhru, and Phramaha Mit Thitapanyo. 2020. “คุณสมบัติ พื้นฐาน ของชาวพุทธ (The Basic Features of Buddhist).” Dhammathas Academic Journal 20(4): 217–228. so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dhammathas/article/view/158728
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kullanit Nitiwarangkul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are aware that articles published in Atlantis are indexed and made available through various scholarly and professional search tools, including but not limited to Erudit.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to preprint their work, that is, post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Read more on preprints here.
