Wrapped Up in the Cis-Tem
Trans Liveability in the Age of Algorithmic Violence
Keywords:
algorithmic violence, cisheteronormativity, colonialism, digital trans studies, necropolitics, trans liveabilityAbstract
Algorithms pervade our reality and promise to universally enhance our lives, but what happens when this promise is reserved for cisgender people while subjecting trans people to legacies of anti-trans violence that implicate trans liveability? Despite this key question, existing critiques engage only sparingly with the violent legacies perpetuated by algorithms that trans people encounter, rarely go beyond notions of bias, and therefore fail to centre trans experiences. In this article, I extend scholarship on critical algorithm studies, trans studies, and necropolitics through three accounts of lived trans experiences to show the vicious algorithmic operations on trans lives. Centrally, this article argues that algorithms are not neutral, distinct, or progressive. Rather, as a vicious “cis-tem” (playing on the word system), algorithms enact forms of violence towards the possibility of transness, violence that is rooted in legacies of capitalist, colonial, and cisheteronormative power that violate trans lives and radicalise transphobia. Contrasting trans voices against the algorithmic machines, this article offers a novel perspective on the entanglement between algorithms and trans liveability through the lens of algorithmic violence. I demonstrate how algorithms embody racialised and gendered ideals of the human that target trans people through engineered transphobic feedback-loops, cisnormative default, and capitalist profit based on fear. I conclude by reimagining liberatory digital futures.
References
Amaro, Roman. 2022. The Black Technical Object. On Machine Learning and the Aspiration of Black Being. New York: Steinberg Press.
Amoore, Louise. 2009. “Algorithmic War: Everyday Geographies of the War on Terror.” Antipode 41 (1): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00655.x
Armstrong, Amanda. 2017. “Certificates of Live Birth and Dead Names: On the Subject of Recent Anti-Trans Legislation.” South Atlantic Quarterly 116 (3): 621–631. doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3961743
Bauer, Sydney. 2023. “Elon Musk Has Made Anti-Trans Hatred One of Twitter’s Core Features, The Nation.” The Nation. Accessed July 8, 2023. www.thenation.com/article/society/elon-musk-transphobia-twitter
Beauchamp, Toby. 2019. Going Stealth: Transgender Politics and US Surveillance Practices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Beer, David. 2017. “The Social Power of Algorithms.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 1–13. doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology. Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford, MA: Polity.
Bey, Marquis. 2022. Cistem Failure: Essays on Blackness and Cisgender. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bivens, Rena. 2017. “The Gender Binary Will Not be Deprogrammed: Ten Years of Coding Gender on Facebook.” New Media & Society (19): 880–898. doi.org/10.1177/146144481562152
Broussard, Meredith. 2023. More Than a Glitch: Confronting Race, Gender, and Ability Bias in Tech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
cárdenas, micha. 2017. “Dark Shimmers: The Rhythm of Necropolitical Affect in Digital Media.” In Trap Door: Trans Cultural Production and the Politics of Visibility, edited by Reina Gossett, Eric A. Stanley and Johanna Burton. 161–81. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chudy, Emily. 2023. “NHS Algorithms Failing to Recognise Needs of Trans Patients, Experts Warn.” Pink News. Accessed September 2023. www.thepinknews.com/2023/05/06/nhs-algorithms-trans-patients
Clarkson, Nicholas. 2019. “Incoherent Assemblages: Transgender Conflicts in US Security.” Surveillance & Society 17 (5): 618–630. doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i5.12946
Conrad, Kathryn. 2009. “Surveillance, Gender, and the Virtual Body in the Information Age.” Surveillance & Society 6 (4): 380–87. doi.org/10.24908/ss.v6i4.3269
Costanza-Chock, Sasha. 2020. Design Justice: Community-led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Couldry, Nick and Ulises A. Meijas. 2019. The Costs of Connection How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Daniels, Jessie. 2018. “The Algorithmic Rise of the ‘Alt-Right.’” Contexts 17 (1): 60–65.
doi.org/10.1177/1536504218766547
Danielsson, Karin, Andrea Aler Tubella, Evelina Liliequist, and Coppélie Cocq. 2023. “Chapter 52: Queer Eye on AI: Binary Systems versus Fluid Identities.’” In Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence, edited by Simon Lindgren, 595–606. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi.org/10.4337/9781803928562.00061
Davis, Jenny L., Apryl Williams, and Michael W. Yang. 2021. “Algorithmic Reparation.” Big Data & Society 8 (2): 1–12. doi.org/10.1177/20539517211044808
DeCook, Julia R. 2021. “A [White] Cyborg’s Manifesto: The Overwhelmingly Western Ideology Driving Technofeminist Theory.” Media, Culture & Society, 43 (6): 1158–1167.
doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957891
DeVito, Michael Ann. 2022. “How Transfeminine TikTok Creators Navigate the Algorithmic Trap of Visibility via Folk Theorization." Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, no. CSCW2: 1–31.
Duffy, KT, and Alejandro T. Acierto. 2024. “//May your rage inform your actions: Embodying the Monster and Trans Nonbinary Praxis in Creative Coding.” Media-N, 20 (1): 68–84. doi.org/10.21900/j.median.v20i1.1213
Edinger, Julia. 2021. “Facial Recognition Creates Risks for Trans Individuals, Others.” GovTech. Accessed August 2023. hwww.govtech.com/products/facial-recognition-creates-risks-for-trans-individuals-others
Freire, Paulo. 1968. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
GLAAD. 2025. “NEW: GLAAD RESPONDS TO META’S LATEST ANTI-LGBTQ CHANGES TO CONTENT POLICY AND DEI THAT WILL HARM USERS.” GLAAD | GLAAD Rewrites the Script for LGBTQ Acceptance. January 10, 2025. glaad.org/releases/meta-anti-lgbtq-hate-speech-dei/
Haimson, Oliver L, Gorrell, Dykee, Starks, Denny L., and Weinger Zu. 2020. “Designing Trans Technology: Defining Challenges and Envisioning Community-Centered Solutions.” In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20):1–13. doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376669
Hall, Lucy B., and William Clapton. 2021. “Programming the Machine: Gender, Race, Sexuality, AI, and the Construction of Credibility and Deceit at the Border.” Internet Policy Review, 10 (4): 1–23.
Hampton, Lelia Marie. 2023. “A Decolonial Black Feminist Marxist Perspective.” In Feminist AI: Critical Perspectives on Algorithms, Data, and Intelligent Machines, edited by Jude Browne, Stephen Cave, Eleanor Drage and Kerry McInerney, 119–136. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Academic. doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192889898.003.0008
Hicks, Mar. 2019. “Hacking the Cis-tem.” In IEEE Annals of the History of Computin, 41 (1): 20–33. doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2019.2897667
Hoffmann, Anna Lauren. 2017. “Data, Technology, and Gender: Thinking about (and from) Trans Lives.” In Spaces for the Future, edited by Joseph C. Pitt and Ashley Shew. 3–13. New York: Routledge.
Ibrahim, Yasmin. 2023. Digital Racial: Algorithmic Violence and Digital Platforms. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Jereza, Rae. 2022. “The Cissexist Assemblages of Content Moderation.” GNET. December 12, 2022. gnet-research.org/2022/12/12/the-cissexist-assemblages-of-content-moderation
Keith, Morgan. 2023. “From Transphobia to Ted Kaczynski: How TikTok’s Algorithm Enables Far-Right Self-Radicalization.” Business Insider. www.businessinsider.com/transphobia-ted-kaczynski-tiktok-algorithm-right-wing-self-radicalization-2021-11?r=US&IR=T
Keyes, Os. 2018. “The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition.” Proceedings of the ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 88. doi.org/10.1145/3274357
Keyes, Os, and Jeanie Austin. 2022. “Feeling Fixes: Mess and Emotion in Algorithmic Audits.” Big Data & Society 9 (2): 1–12. doi.org/10.1177/2053951722 111377
Klein, Lauren and Catherine D’Ignazio. 2024. “Data Feminism for AI.” In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '24): 100–112. doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658543
Leufer, Daniel. 2021. “Computers Are Binary, People Are Not: How AI Systems Undermine LGBTQ Identity.” Access Now. January 13. https://www.accessnow.org/how-ai-systems-undermine-lgbtq-identity
Lewis, K. 2023. “Colonising the Narrative Space: Unliveable Lives, Unseeable Struggles and the Necropolitical Governance of Digital Populations.” Information, Communication & Society, 26 (12): 2398–2418.
Llamas, Rose and Belk Russel. 2022. “Living in a Digital Society.” In The Routledge Handbook of Digital Consumption, edited by Rosa Llamas and Russell Belk (2nd ed.), 3–21. London: Routledge. doi.org/10.4324/9781003317524
Lugones, María. 2007. “Heterosexualism and the Colonial / Modern Gender System.” Hypatia 22 (1): 186–209. doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x
Mayworm, Samuel, Kendra Albert, and Oliver L. Haimson. 2024. “Misgendered During Moderation: How Transgender Bodies Make Visible Cisnormative Content Moderation Policies and Enforcement in a Meta Oversight Board Case.” The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658907
Mbembe, Achille. 2003. “Necropolitics.” Public Culture 15 (1): 11–40. muse.jhu.edu/article/39984.
McQuillan, Dan. 2022. Resisting AI: An Anti-Fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence. Bristol, United Kingdom: Bristol University Press.
Media Matters. 2021. “TikTok’s Algorithm Leads Users from Transphobic Videos to Far-right Rabbit Holes.” Media Matters. www.mediamatters.org/tiktok/tiktoks-algorithm-leads-users-transphobic-videos-far-right-rabbit-holes
Mollicchi, Silvia. 2017. “Flatness Versus Depth: A Study of Algorithmically Generated Camouflage.” Security Dialogue, 48 (1): 78–94. doi.org/10.1177/0967010616650227
Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression. New York: New York University Press.
Oliver L. Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, and Andrea Wegner. 2021. “Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users: Marginalization and Moderation Gray Areas.” Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2. doi.org/10.1145/3479610
Onuoha, Mimi. 2018. “On Algorithmic Violence: Attempts at Fleshing Out the Concept of Algorithmic Violence.” github.com/MimiOnuoha/On-Algorithmic-Violence
Parsons, Vic. 2021. “Instagram Accused of ‘Sexualising, Policing and Censoring Trans Bodies.” PinkNews. www.thepinknews.com/2021/04/22/instagram-trans-bodies-censorhip-we-deserve-to-be-here
Pele, Antonio, and Caitlin Mulholland. 2023. “On Facial Recognition, Regulation, and Data Necropolitics.” Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. (30): 173.
Pennisi, Giovanni. 2024. “Operationalization of (Trans) gender in Facial Recognition Systems: From Binarism to Intersectionality.” Future Humanities 2(3): e17. doi.org/10.1002/fhu2.17
Pow, Whitney. 2021. “A Trans Historiography of Glitches and Errors." Feminist Media Histories 7 (1): 197–230. doi.org/10.1525/fmh.2021.7.1.197
Puar, Jasbir K. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Pugliese, Joseph. 2016. “Death by Metadata: The Bioinformationalisation of Life and the Transliteration of Algorithms to Flesh.” In Security, Race, Biopower: Essays on Technology and Corporeality, edited by H. Randell-Moon and R. Tippet, 3–20. London: Palgrave.
Quinan, C.L and Nina Bresser. 2020. “Gender at the Border: Global Responses to Gender-Diverse Subjectivities and Nonbinary Registration Practices.” Global Perspectives, 1 (1): 12553. doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.12553
Rauchberg, Jessica. 2022. “#Shadowbanned Queer, Trans, and Sisabled Creator Responses to Algorithmic Oppression on TikTok.” LGBTQ Digital Cultures: A Global Perspective, edited by Paromita Pain. 1st ed., 196–207. New York: Routledge. doi.org/10.4324/9781003196457-15
Ricaurte, Paola. 2019. “Data Epistemologies, the Coloniality of Power, and Resistance.” Television & New Media, 20 (4): 350–365. doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640
_____. 2022. “Ethics for the Majority World: AI and the Question of Violence at Scale.” Media, Culture & Society, 44 (4): 726–745.
Richardson, Michael. 2024. Nonhuman Witnessing: War, Data, and Ecology after the End of the WorldWar, Data, and Ecology after the End of the World. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
Rosinski, Carla. 2021. “Disrupting Cis/Heteronormativity and Interrogating Whiteness: The Advancement of Counseling Through Critical Sex Education.” Counseling and Psychology Dissertations. digitalcommons.lesley.edu/counseling_dissertations
Scheuerman, Morgan Klaus, Madeleine Pape, and Alex Hanna. 2021. “Auto-Essentialization: Gender in Automated Facial Analysis as Extended Colonial Project." Big Data & Society 8 (2): 1–15. doi.org/10.1177/20539517211053712
Shah, Nishant. 2023. “I spy, with my little AI: How Queer Bodies are Made Dirty for Digital Technologies to Claim Cleanness” In Queer Reflections on AI, edited by Michael Klipphahn-Karge, Ann-Kathrin Koster and Sara Morais dos Santos Bruss. 57–72. London: Routledge. doi.org/10.4324/9781003357957-5
Shepherd, Laura J. and Laura Sjoberg. 2012. “Trans- Bodies in/of War(s): Cisprivilege and Contemporary Security Strategy.” Feminist Review, (101): 5–23. doi.org/10.1057/fr.2011.53
Shin, Donghee. 2024. Artificial Misinformation: Exploring Human-Algorithm Interaction Online. Springer Nature.
Silva, Mariah Rafaela. 2021. “Navigating Screens.” SUR-Int'l J. on Hum Rts.18: 197
Silva, T. 2023. “Algorithmic Necropolitics.” Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad (Rio de Janeiro), e22304. (39): 2-28. doi.org/10.1590/1984-6487.sess.2023.39.e22304.a.es
Snorton, C. Riley, and Jin Haritaworn. 2019. “Trans Necropolitics: A Transnational Reflection on Violence, Death, and the Trans of Color Afterlife.” In The Transgender Studies Reader Remix, edited by Susan Stryker and Dylan McCarthy Blackston, 305-316. New York: Routledge.
Spade, Dean. 2020. Mutual Aid: Building Solidarity During this Crisis (and the Next). London: Verso.
Steinbock, Eliza. 2019. Shimmering Images: Trans Cinema, Embodiment, and the Aesthetics of Change. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Tacheva, Jasmina, and Srividya Ramasubramanian. 2023. “AI Empire: Unraveling the Interlocking Systems of Oppression in Generative AI's Global Order." Big Data & Society 10 (2): 1-13 doi.org/10.1177/20539517231219241
Valdivia, Ana, and Martina Tazzioli. 2023. “Datafication Genealogies beyond Algorithmic Fairness: Making Up Racialised Subjects.” In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '23). 840–850. doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594047
Vivienne, Son. 2011. “Trans digital storytelling: Everyday activism, mutuble identity and the problem of visibility.” Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 7(1): 43-54.
Wilcox, Lauren. 2017. “Embodying Algorithmic War: Gender, Race, and the Posthuman in Drone Warfare.” Security Dialogue 48 (1): 11-28. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0967010616657947
_____. 2023. “No Humans in the Loop: Killer Robots, Race, and AI.” In Feminist AI: Critical Perspectives on Algorithms, Data, and Intelligent Machines, edited by Jude Browne, Stephen Cave, Eleanor Drage and Kerry McInerney, 83-100. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Academic. doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192889898.003.0006
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Christoffer Koch Andersen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are aware that articles published in Atlantis are indexed and made available through various scholarly and professional search tools, including but not limited to Erudit.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to preprint their work, that is, post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Read more on preprints here.
