Women’s Studies: Are We "Broad" Enough
Keywords:
University corporatization, Feminist academics, Social Justice, Women's movementsAbstract
The authors consider the “naming debate” in Women’s Studies and the implications of the current tendency to broaden the scope of Women’s Studies by including terms such as “gender” or “feminist” in the name. To this debate, they contribute an analysis of how neoliberal ideology attempts to contain Women’s Studies within the policies and discourses of the corporatization of universities. This paper calls for renewed connections between feminist academics and social justice and women’s movements in order to sustain the transformative politics that have always been part of the feminist project.Metrics
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are aware that articles published in Atlantis are indexed and made available through various scholarly and professional search tools, including but not limited to Erudit.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to preprint their work, that is, post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Read more on preprints here.
