The Fight for Substantive Equality: Women's Activism and Section 15 Of The Charter of Rights

Auteurs-es

  • Mary Eberts Current: Hensel Barristers, Toronto This article was written when the author was Ariel F. Sallows Chair in Human Rights at the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

Mots-clés :

constitutional history, constitutional law, equality rights

Résumé

Abstract

This article discusses the role of women’s groups in the development of section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Charter’s principal equality rights guarantee, entrenched in the Constitution in 1981. Thanks to the leadership of Doris Anderson, submissions to the Special Joint Committee on the Constitution from the Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women (CACSW), the National Action Committee on the Status of Women (NAC), and the National Association of Women and the Law (NAWL) were instrumental in securing changes to section 15. However, the version in the entrenched Charter still fell short of women’s aspirations.

 

Résumé

Cet article aborde le rôle des groupes féministes dans l’élaboration de l’article 15 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés, principale garantie de l’égalité des droits dans la Charte, incorporée à la Constitution en 1981. Grâce au leadership de Doris Anderson, les soumissions au Comité mixte spécial sur la Constitution du Canada faites par le Conseil consultatif canadien sur la situation de la femme (CCCSF), le Comité canadien d’action sur le statut de la femme (CCASF) et l’Association nationale Femme et Droit (ANFD) ont joué un rôle déterminant dans l’obtention des modifications à l’article 15. Toutefois, la version incorporée à la Charte ne répondait toujours pas pleinement aux aspirations des femmes.

Statistiques

Chargement des statistiques…

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Mary Eberts, Current: Hensel Barristers, Toronto This article was written when the author was Ariel F. Sallows Chair in Human Rights at the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

Mary Eberts joined Hensel Barristers as counsel in 2013, after completing her term as Ariel F. Sallows Chair in Human Rights at the University of Saskatchewan. She has litigated in trial or appellate courts in most of the jurisdictions in Canada, in the Federal Court and Court of Appeal, in the Supreme Court of Canada, and at inquests and administrative proceedings, appearing as counsel in many leading cases. She has been litigation counsel for the Native Women’s Association of Canada for over twenty years, and was a co-founder of the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF). She writes and lectures, nationally and internationally, on constitutional and Charter law, Indigenous law, and human rights. Ms. Eberts received her legal education at Western University and the Harvard Law School. She has been a faculty member at the Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, and held the Gordon Henderson Chair in Human Rights at the University of Ottawa. Before opening a specialized litigation practice in 1994, she was a partner at Torys in Toronto.

Références

Anderson, Doris. 1996. Rebel daughter: An Autobiography. Toronto: Key Porter Books.

Anderson, Doris. 2006. “The adoption of section 15: Origins and aspirations,” (5:1 Journal of Law & Equality. 5:1, 39-45.

Beverley Baines. 1981. “Women, human rights and the constitution.” In A. Doerr and M. Carrier, eds. Women and the Constitution in Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, 31-63.

Bowman, Myrna. 1981. “From bad to worse in one easy step: proposed transfer of divorce jurisdiction, an assessment.” In A. Doerr and M. Carrier, eds. Women and the Constitution in Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, 77-93.

Cook, Gail and Mary Eberts. 1976. “Policies affecting work.” In G. Cook, ed. opportunity for choice: A goal for women in Canada. Statistics Canada in association with C. D. Howe, 174-180.

Dawson, Mary. 2008. “The making of section 15 of the Charter,” Journal of Law & Equality 5:1, 25-37.

Eberts, Mary. 1979. “The rights of women.” In R. St. J. MacDonald and John Humphrey, Eds. The Practice of Freedom: Canadian Essays on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Butterworths, 225-248.

Eberts, Mary. 1981. “Women and constitutional renewal.” In A. Doerr and M. Carrier, Eds. Women and the Constitution in Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, 3-27.

Eberts, Mary. 2009. “Women as full citizens: addressing the barriers of gender and race in Canadian constitutional development.” In I. Sulkunen, S. Nevala-Narmi and P.Markkola, Eds. Suffrage, gender and citizenship: international perspectives on parliamentary reform. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 377-414.

Elliott, Robin. 1982. “Interpreting the Charter – Use of the earlier versions as an aid,” UBC Law Review Charter Edition, 11-57.

Fédération des Femmes du Québec. 1981. “Statement on jurisdiction in family law.” In A. Doerr and M. Carrier, Eds. Women and the Constitution in Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, 119-120.

Kome, Penney. 1983. The taking of twenty-eight: women challenge the constitution. Toronto: The Women’s Press.

Kome, Penney. 2007. “Face-off: Doris Anderson at the Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women,” Canadian Women’s Studies 26:2, 61-69.

Leeson, Howard. 2000. “Section 33, The notwithstanding clause: A paper tiger?” IRPP: Choices: Courts and Legislatures. June 6:4

Molgat, Anne, with Joan Grant-Cummings. N.d. NAC Herstory, www.nac-cca.ca

Pal, Leslie and F.L. Morton. 1986. “Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada: From legal defeat to political victory,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 24:1, 141-160.

Reid, Julyan with Linda Markowsky. 2007. “A national presence,” Canadian Women’s Studies 26:2, 56-60.

Romanow, Roy, John Whyte and Howard Leeson. 1984. Canada notwithstanding: The making of the Constitution 1976-1982. Toronto: Carswell / Methuen.

Royal Commission on the Status of Women in Canada. 1970. Report. Ottawa: Information Canada.

Sawer, Marian and Jill Vickers. 2001. “Women’s constitutional activism in Australia and Canada, “Canadian Journal of Women and the Law. 13,1-36.

Strayer, Barry. 2008. “In the beginning…: The origins of section 15 of the Charter,” Journal of Law & Equality 5:1, 13-24.

Tarnopolsky, Walter. 1975. The Canadian Bill of Rights. 2d rev. ed. Toronto: McClelland and Steward, the Carleton Library No. 88, 291.

Williams, Wendy. 1983. “Sex discrimination under the Charter: Some problems of theory,” Paper Presented at the Charter of Rights Educational Fund Conference on Sex Discrimination: An Overview of Canadian & American Law. 19 February, 6.3-6.5. Charter of Rights Educational Fund, Study Day Papers.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2016-07-13

Numéro

Vol. 37 No. 2 (2015): Critical Perspectives on Canadian Anti-Trafficking Discourse and Policy and Canadian Women Challenge the Constitution

Rubrique

37.2 (1) - Canadian Women Challenge the Constitution: The Story Behind the Story

Licence

Les auteurs qui publient dans cette revue acceptent les conditions suivantes:

1. Les auteurs conservent les droits d’auteur et accordent le droit de première publication à la revue. L’œuvre est simultanément sous licence internationale Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 qui permet à d’autres personnes de la partager en citant dans les remerciements l’auteur de l’œuvre et sa publication initiale dans cette revue.

2. Les auteurs savent que les articles publiés dans Atlantis sont indexés et disponibles par le biais de divers outils de recherche universitaires et professionnels, y compris, entre autres, Erudit.

3. Les auteurs peuvent conclure des ententes contractuelles supplémentaires et distinctes pour la distribution non exclusive de la version de l’article publiée par la revue (c’est-à-dire, l’afficher dans un dépôt institutionnel ou la publier dans un livre), en signalant qu’elle a été initialement publiée dans cette revue.

4. Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à prépublier leur œuvre, c’est-à-dire à la publier en ligne (dans un dépôt institutionnel ou sur leur site Web, par exemple) avant et pendant le processus de soumission. Cela peut conduire à des échanges productifs, ainsi qu’à ce que le travail publié soit cité plus tôt et plus souvent. Renseignez-vous davantage ici sur la prépublication.